The late
Hoyt Hickman, one of the Deans of modern United Methodist liturgical thought,
wrote a book titled Worshiping with United Methodists.1 In
it, he sought to answer the question, “What is Christian worship?” He listed
five assumptions that characterize Christian worship. His fourth notion is: Worship should be
relevant and inclusive.
“Relevant”
is a word from which I nearly turn and run.
I get it. I even agree with
it. And, I am hard-pressed to find a
fully appropriate alternative. But I
spent so long – particularly during my seminary years – listening to all kinds
of people harp on “relevance, that to this day it makes my skin crawl.”
It is
certainly the case that what the church does, and this is nowhere more vital
than during worship, should be germane to the lives of its membership. It is also true that sometimes our worship
can be so dated and full of bells & smells that it might as well be in
Latin. Worship that does not connect
with the real lives of worshipers is no worship at all.
My
knee-jerk reaction to the R-word is based on my experience of people who acted
as if “relevance” was something they could package. They might not know what it was, but they
knew it when they saw it. It is as if
they could impose relevance on the worship event with a guitar and sandals.
My take on
worship that is relevant is that it meets people where they are and connects
them with the Spirit of God. That means
that a great deal of the heavy lifting must be done by worshipers. Because for all else that happens in worship,
the focus is on God. Worshipers bring a
gift of adoration and praise to God Almighty.
It is not up to Christian worship to foster a feeling or emotion or even
a state of mind. Christian worship is
about bringing worshiper to the Worshiped.
When worship fosters an opportunity for the congregation to assemble at
the foot of the Throne of Grace – that, y’all, is relevant worship.
1Nashville: Abingdon, 1996.
No comments:
Post a Comment