The United Methodist Church (UMC) is facing a crisis of
sorts. I say “of sorts,” owing to the
fact that no one can be certain of what our church will look like, say, this
time next year. The church will hold a
special Called General Conference in February, from the 23rd to the
16th. (The United Methodist
Church normally convenes its General Conference every four years. This body alone can speak for the
denomination, can set policy and budget for the entire UMC and alter our
communion’s Book of Discipline – our document of organization and polity. (The Book of Discipline is ordered by numbered
paragraphs [¶] rather than page references.
In this writing ¶10.4.A would designate Discipline Paragraph 104,
section 4, sub-section A.) In this
instance, however, the UMC makes provision for a Called General Conference to
meet in the interregnum under certain circumstances. Our Council of Bishops has called this
meeting.)
The stated issue is “human sexuality.” The real matter at hand is how the denomination
will relate to the LGBTQ community.
Currently Paragraph 304.3.1 prohibits the ordination of “self-avowed,
practicing homosexuals. The Social
Principles (a series of statements in the Discipline dealing with current
official teaching on a variety of issues) states:
We affirm that all persons are individuals of sacred worth,
created in the image of God,” and that all persons need the ministry of the
church, the denomination states… The United Methodist Church does not condone
the practice of homosexuality and considers this practice incompatible with
Christian teaching. -- ¶65.G
These are the things that are truly on the table. There are several suggestions as to how the
church should order itself in this matter.
They range from “do nothing, make no changes” to a sweeping revision of our practices.
The final action of the Special Charge Conference (2019) will
precipitate responses on a spectrum with “total dissolution of the denomination
as we know it” on one end and “business as usual” on the other.
One of my major concerns is that I fear that there may be
strong knee-jerk reaction by a lot of people.
So, I offer this word of calm. It
is not the case that delegates will leave 2019 having finally decided all of
the issues and nuances of the question.
Anything that this body decides will require enabling legislation that
will take time to implement, whatever it may be. The UMC has its next regularly-scheduled General
Conference on the calendar for May 5-15 of 2020 (2020). The work of 2019 will fall in the lap of 2020
for fine-tuning and for legislation that 2019 had not foreseen. I believe that we need to remember that the Conferences
elected delegates who will attend 2019 in the year 2015 for attendance at the
2016 General Conference. The Annual
Conferences had no idea at the time what would come before these
delegations. I believe that the 2020
makeup will be decisively different from its predecessors. It will fall to these folks in 2020 to shape
the UMC position with any degree of permanence.
I suspect that enabling legislation will have to wait for General
Conference 2024 to formalize it.
All that is to say that I would hope that Methodist people
would show some restraint in February or March of this year. Observers say that the Queen Mary doesn’t turn
on a dime. The Queen Mary is a speedboat
compared to the machinations of the UMC.
I have every hope that cooler heads will prevail and that no one will do
lasting violence to our witness.
No comments:
Post a Comment