The liturgical season of Lent has a long history. As you can imagine, some aspects of the
seasonal observance change over time. The
church adds some things. Other features
fall away. It can be a fluid time.
One of the practices of days gone by was that the church
took this time to instruct and examine people who had left the church or who
had been dismissed from its fellowship.
It was a bit easier to do when the church was more monolithic. Now, if someone becomes disaffected but does
not desire to live outside the church altogether, they can join another
congregation or denomination. They can
remain anonymous regarding their past church affiliation. Beyond affirming that they have received
baptism (and perhaps answering some questions regarding the mode of baptism)
most churches receive membership transfers no questions asked. If the receiving congregation bothers to
contact the individual’s former church at all it is a formality. It has to do with membership totals rather
than spiritual nurture. So, the idea of
expulsion in the name of church discipline is effectively non-existent. Likewise, a member who chooses to leave for
even the most trivial of reasons does not have to explain or justify their
uniting with another church.
In a different time, a dismissed church member petitioned
the congregation for re-admission. Church and individual examined the separation
and a time of inquiry and instruction followed.
Then, on Easter Day, the approved member re-entered the community of
faith. It was a time of true
reconciliation between a congregation and a returning person.
Now, I am not advocating kicking people out of the church’s
fellowship. Likewise, pressuring folks
with too many questions provides a sure-fire guarantee to run them off. But I see an ideal world where -- if someone
presents themselves for church membership after being a part of another
fellowship – the receiving church might ask, “Why?”
People relocate. They
need a church home. They fall away and
look for a fresh start. I’m good with
that. But, “I didn’t agree with
everything my former church did or believed or said it stood for” might require
some more examination. The “it’s easier
to leave than work out our differences” practice brings a lot of malcontents
into local churches for a lot of the wrong reasons. Again, I look at an ideal where churches look
to make disciples and not claim scalps.
I also look to an ideal where the search for genuine
reconciliation is real.
I can dream, can’t I?
No comments:
Post a Comment