I have been thinking about John 21:1-19, which is the gospel
reading for the week according to the Revised Common Lectionary. As I have noted, this reading is chock-full
of significant items both great and small.
There are the teachings that are grand in scope. But there are also little nuggets that are
worth our consideration as well.
One such piece of material is in the exchange between Jesus
and Simon Peter in verses 15-17. Three
times Jesus asks this disciple, “Do you love me?” And three times this disciple responds in the
affirmative. After each of the disciple’s
responses Jesus gives a piece of direction: ‘Feed
my lambs.’ ‘Tend my sheep.’ ‘Feed my sheep.'
Obviously, there is a lot in play here. Historically the church has interpreted Jesus' three-fold questioning as being a response to Simon Peter’s three denials of
Jesus during the time of Jesus’ arrest.
The church has also looked to this passage – and others – to find out
about Simon Peter’s role in the organization of the early church.
But there is a little something else there, and I emphasize “little.” But I don’t mistake little for insignificant.
In each instance, Jesus' inquiry is, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” Part of what interests me here is not the inquiry,
but the address. The narrator tells us, When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said
to Simon Peter… Throughout the
narrative the storyteller refers to this disciple as “Simon Peter.” Yet Jesus himself begins each question, “Simon,
son of John.” I don’t think that is an accident. Nor do I refer to it as being without
meaning.
In chapter 1 verse 42, when Jesus and Simon first meet, Jesus
says, ‘You are Simon son of John. You are
to be called Cephas’ (which is translated Peter). Yet here Jesus refers to Peter by his
former name. Everyone knows Simon, John’s
son. Jesus gives him a new name. Such a thing always reflects a major
transition in scripture. Abram become
Abraham. Sarai becomes Sarah. Jacob became Israel. Later, Saul of Tarsus will become the apostle
Paul. The change of name mirrors a transition
in role or significance.
And Simon came to be known as Peter. The writer of the Fourth Gospel refers to the
apostle usually, but not exclusively, as Simon Peter, although he occasionally
just uses Peter as the name. "Simon”
is not a reference that this writer uses.
But here, here Jesus asks, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” I think that the address is as much a
challenge as the question. It is as if
Jesus is saying, “Simon, when I met you, I gave you a new name. It bespoke of your place as my disciple, my
apostle, my witness in the world and as one who would speak with my authority
once I departed. So, Simon, are you
worthy of that new name. Will you be
Peter? Will you be the rock upon which I
establish my church?” The thrice-asked
question and a triad of addresses are really saying the same thing: “Simon, do
you love me so that you can be my rock?
Will you take up again the mantle of Peter that you have cast
aside? Will you leave behind the fish
and truly fish for people?”
When Simon says, “Yes,” he is really affirming both. He is saying, “I will feed, tend, feed."
"And I will be Peter.”
No comments:
Post a Comment